The Telegram Gold Rush: Why Creators Are Abandoning Substack for Channel Monetization


I remember when Substack felt like the promised land. It was clean, simple, and promised to kill the legacy media gatekeepers once and for all. Just write, hit publish, and watch the subscribers trickle in. For a few years, it worked beautifully. But lately, the mood has shifted. I talk to creators every single day, and the vibe is changing. The honeymoon phase with the newsletter model is officially over.
The reason? It’s too static. It’s a one-way street. You pour your heart out into a 2,000-word essay, hit send, and wait for the inbox gods to grant you a decent open rate. If the algorithm at Gmail or Outlook decides your email is spam, you’re invisible. If your readers are distracted which they always are they might never even open it. Enter Telegram. It’s messy, it’s loud, and frankly, it’s where the actual attention is migrating.
Let’s be honest. Nobody likes their inbox anymore. It’s become a graveyard for promotional junk and half-read newsletters. Substack writers are battling for scraps of attention in a space that people increasingly view as a chore. My inbox is a to-do list, not a place I go for joy.
Telegram, by contrast, feels like a living room. When you post a message, it doesn’t get buried under a pile of meeting invites. It hits the phone like a text message from a friend. That psychological difference is massive. It changes how people consume content. It’s immediate. It’s visceral.
I watched a creator switch from a weekly newsletter to a Telegram channel last winter. Within a month, her engagement numbers went through the roof. Why? Because she stopped writing essays and started sharing thoughts, quick audio clips, and screen grabs of things she was working on. It was raw. It wasn't 'polished' in the traditional sense, and that was the point. People were tired of the manicured, long-form content. They wanted the unfiltered stuff.
Money. That’s what this usually comes down to, right? Substack takes its cut, and the platform feels increasingly like a walled garden. Telegram doesn’t care how you monetize. You can sell access through a private group, use a third-party bot to manage subscriptions, or integrate crypto payments if that’s your thing. It’s the Wild West, and for a lot of creators, the Wild West is better than the corporate office park.
The friction for a user to pay you on Telegram is almost non-existent. We’re talking two or three taps. No credit card forms, no weird logins. The conversion rates are just higher. When you lower the barrier to entry, you invite more people to support you.
Do you actually own your Substack list? Kind of. But try moving that audience to another platform without losing 30% of them to the ether. Telegram offers a different kind of control. You can export your data, you can build bots that talk to your users directly, and you aren’t bound by the platform's editorial politics or sudden changes in policy. It’s ownership in the sense that you control the pipe, not just the water.
Substack is a reading experience. Telegram is a participation experience. When a reader comments on a Substack post, it’s a lonely experience. You post a comment, maybe the author sees it, maybe they don’t. In a Telegram community, you’re part of a conversation. You’re seeing others reacting in real-time. It’s communal.
The creators who succeed here aren't the ones who just broadcast. They’re the ones who facilitate. They ask questions. They drop polls. They let the audience feel like they have a stake in what’s being produced. It’s not just a subscription; it’s a membership to a collective.
If you’re thinking about making the leap, don't just delete your Substack tomorrow. That’s a mistake. Start by cross-promoting. Give your newsletter subscribers a 'sneak peek' into what you’re doing on Telegram. Run a small experiment. Move your most 'premium' content to the channel and see who follows.
It’s going to be awkward at first. You’ll feel like you’re shouting into the void for a bit. That’s normal. The people who are truly invested in your voice will follow you to Telegram because they want the connection, not just the content.
We’re watching the death of the 'one-to-many' broadcast model. Everything is moving toward 'few-to-few' and high-trust, high-frequency interactions. Telegram is just the first major tool to prove this works at scale for independent creators. It won’t be the last. But for right now, it’s the place to be if you want to actually build something that lasts.
Think about the longevity of your brand. Do you want to be a newsletter writer at the mercy of inbox algorithms, or do you want to be a digital creator at the center of a community? The answer feels pretty clear to me. The gold rush isn't about finding more subscribers; it's about deepening the ones you already have. Telegram is just the shovel that makes the digging easier.
This isn't just a trend. It's a fundamental change in how we relate to digital authority. When you strip away the polished headers and the fancy landing pages, you're left with the creator and the audience. And honestly, that's enough.
Ethnic Koti Editorial Team. (2026). "The Telegram Gold Rush: Why Creators Are Abandoning Substack for Channel Monetization". Ethnickoti Blog. Retrieved from https://ethnickoti.com/blog/telegram-gold-rush-creator-monetization
Join the conversation. Be respectful and helpful.